
VO2 max improves when the week includes enough easy aerobic work to build capacity and enough hard work to raise the ceiling. Most people need less heroics and more structure.
Most people need more low-to-moderate intensity aerobic work than they think. This is the work often called Zone 2: hard enough that conversation is possible but not effortless.
That intensity helps build the aerobic machinery that supports longer efforts and better recovery . It is not flashy, but it is where a lot of useful adaptation happens.
For someone starting from low fitness, brisk walking uphill, cycling, rowing, or easy jogging can all count. The exact mode matters less than consistency.
Most engines are built with boring work.
Darin Allred
Higher-intensity intervals are where VO2 max often moves more directly. Meta-analytic work suggests interval training can produce larger VO2 max gains than moderate continuous training in many settings.
This does not mean every session should be brutal. One or two interval sessions per week is enough for most people, especially if the rest of the week includes easier aerobic work.
A useful template is simple: repeat hard efforts of three to five minutes with equal or slightly longer recovery. The intervals should feel hard enough that you would not want to hold a conversation.
A common mistake is training in the gray zone all the time: too hard to be easy, too easy to be truly hard. That leaves people tired without giving either system a clean signal.
A polarized split, mostly easier work with a smaller amount of real intensity, has a lot going for it. Even if your exact percentages are not perfect, the broad point holds. Separate the jobs.
You do not need to choose between the engine and muscle, but you do need to program them with some care. Concurrent training can improve both strength and endurance, though the order and weekly layout matter.
A useful rule of thumb: if strength is the priority that day, lift first. If an interval session is the priority, do it on fresher legs. Easy aerobic work is the easiest piece to place because it creates the least interference.
A laboratory VO2 max test is the cleanest measure, but it is not required to make progress. Wearables can provide directional estimates and field tests like the Cooper 12-minute test offer a repeatable outside option.
The point is not precision for its own sake. It is to keep perception from drifting. People are usually worse than they think when detrained and better than they realize once training becomes consistent.
Separate easy from hard and both start working better.
Darin Allred
If you want a usable weekly structure, start here:
- three sessions of easy aerobic work
- one interval session
- keep at least one day lighter or fully off
- adjust volume only after the routine feels repeatable
That is enough to move the needle for a lot of people.
Building the engine is less about suffering and more about accumulation.
One experiment to try this week: do three 30-minute brisk walks and one simple interval session of four hard minutes followed by four easy minutes, repeated four times. One signal to notice is recovery the next day. The tradeoff is that better VO2 max usually comes from patience with boring work.
Do I need to run to improve VO2 max?
No. Walking uphill, cycling, rowing, swimming, or any mode that challenges the cardiorespiratory system can work.
How many interval sessions should I do each week?
Usually one or two is enough for most non-athletes.
Can I build VO2 max and muscle at the same time?
Yes, if training is sequenced sensibly.
Do wearables estimate VO2 max accurately enough?
They are not perfect, but they are often useful for trend.
Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, et al. "Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association." Circulation. 2016;134(24):e653-e699
Milanovic Z, Sporis G, Weston M. "Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIT) and Continuous Endurance Training for VO2max Improvements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials." Sports Med. 2015;45(10):1469-1481
Seiler S. "What Is Best Practice for Training Intensity and Duration Distribution in Endurance Athletes?." Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(3):276-291
Huiberts RO, Wust RCI, van der Zwaard S. "Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Sex and Training Status." Sports Med. 2024;54(2):329-353
Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, et al. "Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice." Circulation. 2016;134(24):e653-e699
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000461Improve
How to Build Aerobic Reserve

Improve
March 20, 2026

Improve
March 20, 2026

Improve
March 20, 2026